Health Lifestyle Social Issues

Is Fluoride Bad for You? Examining the Evidence Behind the Debate

·
·
11 min read
Summary

Fluoride in the water supply has long been a topic of heated discussion. It seems to prevent tooth decay. But what about its effects on the rest of your body? What are the main sources of fluoride exposure in our daily lives? Is there a difference between the effects of fluoride in toothpaste and fluoride in drinking water? What is the latest scientific consensus? And how can you make informed choices for yourself and your loved ones?

When Frederick McKay graduated from the University of Pennsylvania’s Dental School in 1900, he had no idea that his new dental practice would lead to one of the most significant public health discoveries of the 20th century.

Setting up shop in Colorado Springs, McKay soon noticed something unusual — many residents had mottled brown stains on their teeth. It looked as if they had all been eating chocolate candy (but there were no telltale Hershey’s wrappers sticking out of their pockets).

Curious, McKay began investigating, and his findings caught the attention of other dental researchers. Eventually, similar cases were identified in communities across the country. Public health experts tested soil and water samples, and in 1931, the culprit was finally identified: high levels of naturally occurring fluoride in the local water supply.

Then came the second surprise — people with these stained teeth also had far fewer cavities. It turned out that fluoride, while causing excessive discoloration, also strengthened tooth enamel, making teeth more resistant to decay. This discovery paved the way for fluoride’s addition to dental products such as toothpaste and mouthwash and, eventually, to the public water supply.

As of this writing, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) considers water fluoridation one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century. When fluoridation programs became widespread in the US after 1945, the rates of tooth decay among Americans soon plummeted by about 25%.

More recently, however, water fluoridation has become extremely controversial. While it’s clear that fluoride benefits dental health, the chemical doesn’t just end up on your teeth when you drink it; it affects your entire body. And there’s increasing concern about the effects of fluoridation on pregnant women and children.

It’s also worth considering that the broad availability of fluoride-containing dental care products may render the continuation of water fluoridation unnecessary.

In this article, we’ll separate fluoride fact from fiction and identify its known risks and benefits so you can make the right decisions for your health and that of your loved ones.

What Is Fluoride and How Is It Used?

Checking the composition of toothpaste with a magnifying glass against the background of many tubes. Dangerous toothpaste ingredient fluoride.
istock.com/Alona Siniehina

Fluorine is a highly reactive gas at room temperature and is one of the halogens (like chlorine and iodine). Fluoride is the ionic form of fluorine, and it is produced when fluorine gains an electron. This electron turns fluoride into a stable ion that forms compounds rather than existing as a gas.

Fluoride is used largely to promote dental health. Dentists apply it during regular checkups, municipalities add it to the water to improve public dental health, and consumer products like toothpaste, mouthwash, and floss often contain fluoride.

Fluoride is also found​​ in some supplements, pesticides, cleaning products, and medical imaging scans, such as PET scans. It’s also used to manufacture Teflon, steel, and aluminum.

Reported Benefits of Widespread Fluoride Use

Given the widespread use of fluoride in the water supply (over 70% of US residents receiving public water get fluoridated water), it’s reasonable to ask why. What are the benefits of fluoridated water according to public health officials who promote the practice?

There’s one apparent benefit of fluoride: dental health.

Topical Fluoride and Dental Health

Adorable little sibling brother and sister brushing their teeth while looking in the bathroom mirror. Little girl and boy practising good oral hygiene. Brushing twice a day is important
istock.com/PeopleImages

As we’ve seen from the Colorado Brown Stain incident, fluoride was shown to strengthen tooth enamel (the hard outermost surface of teeth, which is harder than bone and may even be harder than not tapping your feet at a Taylor Swift concert), thus preventing tooth decay.

This finding isn’t in question; multiple studies have shown (and continue to show) that fluoride prevents tooth decay and improves dental health in children. A 2015 study out of Bosnia and Herzegovina found that six months of topical fluoride treatment significantly improved dental health in a group of children compared to controls who were not given the treatment.

Two comprehensive reviews by Cochrane (an organization largely respected by medical researchers for its impartiality and rigor) — one in 2003 and the other in 2019 — found that fluoride in toothpaste reduces tooth decay.

The 2003 meta-analysis examined 70 studies involving more than 42,000 children, and the 2019 review analyzed data from almost 100 studies involving over 60,000 participants. In both cases, researchers concluded that fluoride toothpastes are significantly more effective in preventing cavities than non-fluoride toothpastes.

I want to point out something here. These studies look at the effectiveness of fluoride in toothpaste. They don’t say anything about fluoridated water. So what about the evidence for fluoridation of the public water supply? Is it as robust and conclusive?

Fluoridated Water and Dental Caries

When we look at the rates of dental caries (the process of enamel decay) and cavities (the holes caused by this process), it’s clear that these rates declined when communities began fluoridating their water.

A 2013 study examined the impact of fluoridated drinking water on reducing cavities in Australian adults, comparing those born before 1960 (whose water wasn’t fluoridated) with those born between 1960 and 1990 (whose water did contain fluoride). The results showed that individuals with over 75% lifetime exposure to fluoridated water had fewer dental issues, indicating that fluoridated water did reduce cavities.

A 2018 study similarly examined the impact of fluoridated drinking water on dental health in US children and adolescents. Again, those in areas with fluoridated water experienced significantly fewer cavities. And the younger the child, the greater the protective effect. Specifically, children aged 2 to 8 had about 30% fewer cavities in their primary (baby) teeth, while those aged 6 to 17 saw a 12% reduction in cavities in their permanent teeth.

Since 1962, the US Public Health Service has recommended adding fluoride to drinking (tap) water to reduce the risk and severity of dental caries. They’ve identified 0.7 milligrams per liter as the concentration that maximizes fluoride’s oral health benefits while minimizing potential harm.

Other major health organizations, such as the World Health Organization, and professional dental groups, such as the International Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research and the American Dental Association, also endorse fluoride use in water.

The Community Preventive Services Task Force reported back in 2000 that water fluoridation caused an average decrease in dental caries of almost 30% in children ages 4 to 17 years compared to control groups whose water was not fluoridated.

However, based on the Cochrane reviews referenced in the previous section, no reputable studies have aimed to determine the effectiveness of water fluoridation for preventing caries in adults.

A recent JAMA Health Forum cost-effectiveness analysis found that cessation of public water fluoridation would increase tooth decay and the cost of dental care among children in the US. Although they acknowledged concerns regarding toxic effects associated with high levels of fluoride, they still recommend ongoing benefits of water fluoridation at safe levels.

The most recent Cochrane Review in 2024 evaluated community water fluoridation and concluded that it may modestly reduce dental caries in children’s baby teeth and slightly increase cavity-free rates—but with low-certainty evidence, especially in the modern context of fluoride toothpaste. They note the benefit for permanent teeth remains uncertain, while the risk of mild dental fluorosis persists. The report does not examine or comment on general fluoride toxicity beyond cosmetic dental fluorosis.

And when we look at a major public health initiative, we have to consider both potential benefit and potential harm. Regarding the latter, controversy has surrounded water fluoridation from the beginning.

The Debate Over Public Water Fluoridation

Mother and her toddler filling a glass with filtered water right from the tap
istock.com/Kemal Yildirim

Despite evidence that fluoride in the water supply can preserve tooth enamel in children, it’s not universally accepted that the benefits outweigh the potential risks. Most developed countries do not fluoridate their water

For one thing, there are concerns that people can get overexposed to fluoride, especially if they already get it from their dental hygiene products.

And there’s a big difference between topical application of fluoride (from toothpaste, mouthwash, or floss) and drinking it. When you drink fluoridated water, that fluoride affects your body systemically. In the UK and other countries, the advice on fluoridated dental products is to avoid swallowing them, especially for children.

Possible Risks of Water Fluoridation

So, what are the risks that prompted the fluoride debate? Let’s look at the major ones.

Dental and Skeletal Fluorosis

We’ve seen that too much fluoride in water when teeth are growing in childhood can lead to discoloration, which is known as dental fluorosis.

Fluoride can also become concentrated in your bones (a condition known as skeletal fluorosis), stimulating bone cell growth, altering bone tissue structure, and weakening your skeleton.

Neurological Effects of Fluoride

Children, kindergarten and reading book in classroom, childhood development and growth for vocabulary in school. Listening, knowledge and information with storybook, learning and fantasy for friends
istock.com/Jacob Wackerhausen

Most studies showing harmful neurological effects were conducted on laboratory animals, like this 2019 experiment on baby rats that showed impaired memory and measurable changes in their brains. (Our view on the use of animals in medical research is here.) Fortunately, scientists are not allowed to conduct research like this on humans. However, they can run “natural experiments” in populations where different communities have different levels of exposure to fluoridated water.

A 2012 review analyzed 27 studies, mainly from China, and discovered a consistent pattern of lower intelligence scores among children exposed to higher fluoride levels.

A 2025 paper published in JAMA Pediatrics has rekindled debate over fluoridation — some of it quite heated. Researchers analyzed 74 studies (mainly from China and India and some from Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, Iran, Mexico, Pakistan, and Spain). They found that children in high-fluoride areas may have significantly lower IQ scores than those who live in low-fluoride areas.

For perspective, water fluoride concentrations in China and India are considerably higher than in the US water supply.

The potential effects of fluoridated water on the brain are not limited to memory and intelligence. A 2021 study out of Canada found that a one milligram per liter increase in the fluoride level in tap water raised the odds of a diagnosis of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children by more than 6 times. (For context, the amount generally added to US tap water is 0.7 milligrams per liter.)

The EPA is actively reviewing fluoride based on newer research—particularly considering the 2024 National Toxicology Program report linking exposure above 1.5 mg/L to possible neurodevelopmental effects in children.

Fluoride and Thyroid Function

Other bodily systems and organs may also be harmed by fluoridated water. A 2024 systematic review found a potential association between chronic high levels of fluoride exposure and thyroid damage.

That bolstered confidence in the findings of another older study, which found that Canadian adults with moderate-to-severe iodine deficiencies may be at an increased risk for underactive thyroid gland activity when exposed to higher fluoride levels.

Is Fluoridated Water Necessary for Dental Health These Days?

Flat composition for oral care and place for text on a light background. Dental hygiene
istock.com/White Bear Studio

The first fluoridated toothpaste appeared on store shelves in the US in 1956. (For trivia buffs, the brand was Crest.) Since the widespread availability of fluoride toothpaste and other fluoridated products, dental cavities have decreased in countries with and without water fluoridation.

Proponents of water fluoridation contend that the practice has reduced oral health disparities. They say it ensures everyone gets a consistent dose of fluoride, helping to lower cavity rates across the board.

In fact, a 2024 study published in the prestigious journal Nature found that US communities with more Hispanic or Latino residents had higher levels of fluoride in the water supply than predominantly white areas. But given what we know about bones, brains, and thyroids, that might be worsening the health of these communities.

Issues With Informed Consent

Mother and child spending time in the living room.child drinking water
istock.com/Keys

Given the evidence of potential neurological harm that may impair children’s cognitive development and increase the risk of ADHD, there’s a serious ethical issue here. Namely, parents can’t give or withhold consent to the fluoridation of their children.

Most US households get fluoridated water when they turn on their taps. Globally, over 400 million people in 25 countries have community water fluoridation.

To be clear, we treat water for many reasons: to kill pathogens, harden or soften it, and filter out harmful or bad-tasting chemicals. But fluoridation is categorically different. Unlike all other water treatment processes, fluoridation does not treat the water but the person consuming it, which is a form of mass medication.

According to the FDA, fluoride is a drug, not a nutrient, when used to prevent disease. For this reason, most Western European nations have rejected water fluoridation. In their view, the public water supply is not an appropriate place to add drugs.

What You Can Do: Take Action for Your Health

Given all this uncertainty, I won’t make any definitive proclamations about whether fluoride is inherently safe here. But I do have opinions, which I hope will help you make up your own mind on the matter.

One of my takeaways is that fluoride in toothpaste and dental floss is probably helpful in cavity prevention for most people. As long as you use small amounts (the size of a pea, as my toothpaste tube informs me), avoid swallowing it, and rinse your mouth well, you’ll likely absorb only minimal amounts into your body.

Water fluoridation may benefit your teeth, but it also may negatively affect other areas of your body, including your brain. If you regularly use fluoridated toothpaste and/or mouthwash, the risks of consuming fluoride in water may outweigh any potential benefits. And that may be especially true for adults with fully-formed tooth enamel.

Tips for Managing Fluoride Exposure

woman in the kitchen
istock.com/elenaleonova

So, what can you do if you decide that fluoridated water isn’t worth the risk? It’s not like candy or soda, that you can just walk past in the grocery store and not toss into your shopping cart.

1. Check for Fluoridation in the Water Supply

If you live in many parts of the US, you can check whether your city fluoridates its water using the CDC’s “My Water’s Fluoride” online database. (Note: several states, including New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, Arizona, Washington, Wyoming, Montana, and South Dakota, declined to share this data with the CDC.) You may also be able to contact your local water provider or district to inquire.

2. Filter Your Water

Front View Of Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System In Kitchen Cabinet
istock.com/onurdongel

If your water is fluoridated and you wish it weren’t, you may want to invest in a water filtration system. Not all systems are equally (or even at all) effective in removing fluoride; the best ones are reverse osmosis units and water softeners.

For our recommendations on the best home water treatment systems, check out our article on Drinking Water Treatment: When It’s Necessary & What Your Options Are.

3. Check Personal Care Products and Vitamins

You can also check if your personal care products and supplements contain fluoride. If they do, make sure that your children aren’t overusing them.

  • For ages three to six, no more than the size of a pea of fluoride-containing toothpaste should be smeared on a child’s toothbrush.
  • Before age three, when children are likely to swallow a decent amount of toothpaste, parents should smear no more than the size of a grain of rice on a child’s toothbrush.
  • For children younger than two, consult your doctor or dentist before using fluoride toothpaste or other fluoride products.

Also be sure to check the labels of multivitamins, which may also contain sodium fluoride.

4. Check for Fluoride Content in Other Dietary Staples

Woman checking ingredients on back of milk carton in supermarket
iStock.com/FangXiaNuo

Some countries have added fluoride to grocery staples such as table salt and milk. Salt is often fluoridated in Caribbean and Latin American countries, while you’ll encounter fluoridated milk in Bulgaria, Thailand, Chile, China, Peru, and parts of the Russian Federation.

For reference, here are the Daily Tolerable Upper Intake Levels for Fluoride, according to the US National Institutes of Health:

Age Male Female Pregnancy Lactation
Birth to 6 months .07 mg .07 mg
7–12 months 0.9 mg 0.9 mg
1–3 years 1.3 mg 1.3 mg
4–8 years 2.2 mg 2.2 mg
9–13 years 10 mg 10 mg
14–18 years 10 mg 10 mg 10 mg 10 mg
19+ years 10 mg 10 mg 10 mg 10 mg

Stay Informed on Fluoride

Fluoride remains a complex and controversial topic, balancing dental health benefits with potential health concerns. While it has played a crucial role in reducing tooth decay, the widespread availability of fluoridated dental products and evolving public health data call for reevaluating its necessity — and its ethical implications — in water supplies. As research continues to unfold, informed personal decisions, such as monitoring fluoride exposure and using appropriate filtration systems, can help people make conscious and intentional choices.

Editor’s Note: A reliable home water filter is a smart way to protect your family while reducing the financial and environmental impact of bottled water. Our top recommendation is AquaTru, a countertop reverse osmosis system that combines advanced carbon filtration with exceptional water quality and taste. It’s highly efficient, requires no installation, and has low maintenance costs, making it a convenient and cost-effective solution.

The manufacturer reports that AquaTru removes more than 93% of fluoride, along with chromium-6, PFAS, and dozens of other contaminants, which helps ensure clean, safe drinking water. Right now, Food Revolution Network members can enjoy a very special discount. Click here to learn more.

If you make a purchase through that link, AquaTru will contribute a portion of the proceeds to support Food Revolution Network’s mission. (Thank you!)

Tell us in the comments:

  • Is your tap water fluoridated?
  • Do you have a water filter?
  • Do you choose oral health products with or without fluoride?

Featured image: istock.com/Irina_Timokhina

Read Next:

  • ALL shower filters on the market are ineffective in removing the most harmful health-related contaminants – no matter what the promoters say. There are ZERO certified (NSF, IAPMO, WQA) shower filters for removing the serious tap water contaminants. It would have to be too large and expensive to to be effective.

    Slovak

  • Jane,
    You don’t really need a fluoride removal shower filter…because the studies show that fluoride is poorly adsorbed through the skin. Furthermore, the amount of fluoride you might absorb through inhalation is insignificant.

    Slovak

  • Greetings Myila! Thank you for your comment to me! I was involved in getting the fluoride out of our Calgary water supply 2 decades ago. Much more information was available back then, including lots of papers and studies by natural and health conscious doctors. And studies weren’t as skewed back then to get the answer that was wanted.

    Now, when you look at the internet, over the years, most of that information was quietly removed. And replaced with studies that showed favorability to corporate interests.

    And quoting agencies like the WHO or government data, is like asking the fox to guard the henhouse. They are some of the very organization that require a dumbed down population.

    My guess is that the only people who would still retain any of that information, are the alternative sites that set up individually to counteract the corporate and government controls…so they wouldn’t be censored.

    Getting info from anything mainstream is dangerous when we look at where our world is at, and the level of corruption everywhere we look.

    It’s kind of like asking the WHO or a doctor or a government what should be included in a healthy diet, when they know nothing about health. Their mandates are not for our health, it is all about corporate interests. Kind of like Healthline and WebMD. This is propaganda for alterior motives.

    I would have thought since you all work for the benefit of the people and their health that you would be aware of this.

    With the types of references in the article, I was wondering if someone had AI write the article?

    I will look around to see what I can find. You guys need to do more in-depth research from more hidden sources. When we read something, if we still have our critical thinking without bias, we should be able to discern Truth, or at least that something is not right.

    And remember…the term “conspiracy theory” was devised by agencies like the CIA, etc. to shame people into staying silent and not ask questions; and for people to not confront the “powers-that-shouldn’t-be” when thy are up to something that is just plain wrong.

    We’ve got such a death culture/mindset that people choose to blind themselves to what is going on around them, and often right in front of them. It is a grave sin to contribute to that. Our younger generations seem to no-loner know (or care) about what is real and what is Truth.

    Y’all need better ways to research and find archived materials.

    Have a GREAT day!

    I truly do appreciate all that you do at FRN. I just felt compelled to call this article out. I couldn’t stay silent to something so egregious, that could move people to make decisions that will harm them in the long haul.

    I wish you the greatest Victory in all you are doing!

  • US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) considers water fluoridation one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century.
    Question: Who is this person in this quote? If you call CDC no one really knows who said this.
    Floride is a very dangerous chemical that has no qualities for a water treatment and should not be forced on the public.

  • Hi Stella, Thanks for sharing your routine and experience. We are glad your dental check-ups are so good! We understand the extra caution when you’re managing Hashimoto’s and bone health

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Hi June,
    We agree the distinction between natural and added forms (and doses) matters.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Hi Jenny, collecting and filtering your own rainwater is a smart workaround.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Yorkshire Water doesn’t currently add fluoride, and any future move to do so would first go through public consultation. If that happens, a certified reverse-osmosis or activated-alumina filter will strip most added fluoride. Your fluoride-free toothpaste is fine as long as it still supports remineralisation.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Hi Elaine, Thank you for sharing your concern about fluoride sourced from abroad. No matter where additives originate, U.S. suppliers must certify they meet NSF/ANSI Standard 60 for drinking-water treatment chemicals. Local water utilities should also have certificates of analysis available to the public.

    If you’ve encountered credible studies or regulatory reports showing that imported fluoride additives routinely fail these safety standards, please feel free to send information to [email protected]. We’ll review them.
    We appreciate your vigilance on this important quality-control issue.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Hi Judy, Thank you for raising the issue of fluoride sourcing. Most municipal systems add industrial‐grade sodium fluoride or fluorosilicic acid are by-products of phosphate fertilizer production, not nuclear waste. Nevertheless, questions about contaminants and supply-chain oversight are important.
    If you have peer-reviewed research documenting safety gaps or contamination problems in current fluoride additives, please send it our way at [email protected]. We’re committed to reviewing credible evidence.
    We appreciate your vigilance and your commitment to safe public water.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Hi Johnny, We appreciate you taking the time to comment. It’s true that fluoride, like many substances, can be toxic at high doses. The studies we reviewed show that at or below this level of .7 ppm, most populations do not experience measurable harm, but we know some researchers disagree.

    If you have peer-reviewed studies or systematic reviews indicating toxicity at typical drinking-water levels, please share them with us at [email protected]. We’ll review anything you send.

    Thank you for engaging respectfully and helping us all learn.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Hi Mc, Thanks for weighing in. We understand your frustration and respect that many people feel fluoridation chemicals may cause more harm than benefit. We examined decades of peer-reviewed studies. Still, we recognize there are legitimate questions about industrial sources, lobbying practices, and possible long-term effects.

    If you have peer-reviewed research or official reports, please share them with us at [email protected]. Our editorial team will gladly give them a fresh look.

    Thanks again for helping keep this conversation evidence-based.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Hi Louisa, Thank you for reading and for sharing your perspective. We hear that you believe fluoride poses far greater risks than our article conveyed, and that you’d have liked us to come out more strongly against it. Our aim was to summarize the highest-quality research we could find without industry influence or preconceived conclusions but we’re the first to admit that science evolves.

    If you’re aware of peer-reviewed studies or comprehensive government or academic reviews we missed, we’d be grateful if you could provide those to our team at [email protected]. We will review anything you send.

    Our mission is to empower people with balanced, evidence-based information so they can make healthy, sustainable choices. Your feedback helps us live up to that promise.

    ~Myila, FRN Team

  • Our water in Yorkshire (UK) is not presently fluoridated, so we do not need to use a water filter. However, they are considering adding fluorite to our water, and if they do, we shall most likely install one. We specially select fluoride -free toothpaste , even though it costs much more than regular toothpaste, and we avoid mouthwashes, as they are more harmful than beneficial. Thank you for publishing this article.

  • We live rural so collect rainwater from the roof which is then filtered before entering our home so all the water we use is filtered. So thankful as they have just added fluoride to our town water supply here in Whangarei NZ

  • My dentist offers topical fluoride treatments after in office cleanings. Is this a good idea? I do live in an area where fluoride is added to the water, and I do use a toothpaste with fluoride.

  • When I first came to Canada many years ago I listened to a programme on CBC Radio on the subject of fluoride. I remember one speaker emphasizing that there is an important difference between naturally occurring fluoride and that which is added to water in some areas. I was lucky to have been born and brought up in an English town where fluoride occurred naturally. Now, in Montreal, they have never agreed to fluoridating the water. To my mind the thought of adding fluoride to the water supply is the same as saying that many people suffer from constipation and therefore a laxative should be added to the water supply! Doesn’t that sound foolish?

  • My town in eastern Washington state is looking at not having it put in the water here. They just did a huge survey and asked for comments. We will see how it goes….

  • If dentists were only in it for the money, they would NOT recommend fluoride. They make a LOT more on fillings, crowns, root canals and extractions than they ever do on fluoride treatments. They recommend it because of the science and their experience.

  • I’ve been looking for a toothpaste with hydroxyapatite (recommended by Canadian MD Trozzi) instead of fluoride, but the only one I’ve found contains both. I’ll continue to use fluoride-free until I find what I’m looking for.

  • We use no fluoride toothpaste, have a water filtration system, and a whole house water softener system. No cavities for a very long time. I have Hashimoto’s (I’m a woman) and don’t want my thyroid gland to be affected more than it has been. And now in my 70’s my bones don’t need to be affected either. My husband and I recently got a clean bill of health from our dentist. Zero cavities. I think there’s enough fluoride in the water to have to add any more into your body. I’m from Argentina where there are not a bunch of snack foods and candies unlike the amount in the US. And not all parts if my country have fluoridated water. And yet the people have very healthy teeth. Thank you for the article

  • Looking for a fluoride shower filter! I was tested and it revealed high fluoride.
    I live in San Diego.
    Thank you!!

  • As a senior citizen, age 70, I have chosen to use NON-fluoridated toothpaste products. Regular toothpaste with fluoride and other chemicals tend to irritate my gums. Also, I don’t like the excess fluoride. Therefore, I purchase toothpaste and mouthwashes without fluoride added. I purchase reputable and consumer-conscious brands. As far as my drinking water, ever since I made a move into an apartment within the city of Pittsburgh, I NEVER consume the tap water! I use spring water what I buy! Sometimes I’m forced to purchase purified bottled water when their stock of spring water is nil. (I try to always recycle the plastic bottle waste.). I don’t like bathing and showering in my tap water either. My hair and skin has suffered since my move into the city! I’m presently looking into purchasing a shower filter for my shower head that removes most of the bad chemicals in the water. It’s become a time-consuming process! I’m hopeful I will get there soon…

  • It wasn’t the fluoride that caused the teeth to be strengthened or hardened…it was the high mineral content of the water.

  • I can get my fluoride from my toothpaste. I have lived with well water for 21 years and have had no cavities.

  • I am going to send this to my city water utility company but will tell them of the error in the word cavity. There are many times in the article, including in one title that it says caries instead of cavities

  • Great article, however it’s nothing about differences between fluoride type
    ( calcium and sodium) very important ! Toothpaste contains sodium fluoride and that is a toxic chemical . Also rabbit holes get deeper and deeper on this controversial subject and more info about experiments with the neurological side affects was discovered in concentrations camps during WWII , the information was very carefully analyzed and sold to CIA to control populations.

  • It is shocking that the toxic affects of fluoride on oral and gut bacteria, which directly affects cardiovascular health and how our bodies metabolize food, is NOT being discussed. Fluoride is widely distributed in many dental products (which are not supposed to be ingested) so it is completely unnecessary for municipal governments to force populations to consume fluoridated water en masse. The City of Calgary recently restarted its water fluoridation program at an installation cost of $25M, and $1M/year operating cost. The City made no mention of the damaging affects to oral/gut bacteria and cardiovascular health when it was presented in a plebiscite to the citizens of Calgary.

    Check out research by Dr. Nathan Bryan and Dr. Louis Ignarro. They have done extensive research into how fluoride inhibits the production of nitric oxide in the body, and its associated damaging impact to metabolism. Dr. Ignarro won the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1998 for his discovery that nitric oxide acts as a signaling molecule in the cardiovascular system.

  • The word “poison” with a skull and crossbones was on the bag because fluoride in that amount definitely has a toxicity level. That bag was going into a massive amount of water to dilute it to a .7-1ppm amount. If you look at the chlorine that is put into pools, it has the same warnings. And yet people get into their pools and expose their largest organ (skin) to it for long periods of time.

  • As a dental hygienist, I have personally seen the benefits of fluoride in oral health. The decision to fluoridate water was a public health decision based on countless studies that showed that fluoride strengthens teeth against decay. There was no dumbing-down agenda. It was simple science. Now whether fluoride effects other parts of the body and brain, I cannot give an educated response and I always respect my patients decisions. I am not totally against removing fluoride from water sources as there are many other options at this time. But I also know that in compromised populations that cannot afford other options, there most certainly will be an adverse effect on oral health if we remove it from water sources. I try to balance my own needs with the needs of others especially when voting and promoting public policy. I suggest you look at reputable sources for your information, not influencers or conspiracy theorists.

  • I am 66 years old and have been using non-fluoridated toothpaste and mouthwash for several years. I started reading about the harmful effects of ingesting fluoride and decided to avoid it. What you haven’t touched on is what is fluoride and where does it come from and who benefits from the sale and distribution of fluoride. I believe that is just as important as whether fluoride is harmful or not. After reading the comment from “Shu”, I can see that my question about what fluoride added to the water supply is really made from. Where do the profits from the sale go? Why is it so hard for the U.S. to have it banned?

  • The city of Calgary is bringing back flouridation starting June 30, 2025. Fluoride was first introduced into Calgary’s drinking water in 1991. Our drinking water remained fluoridated for 20 years until City Council directed Administration to discontinue the practice in 2011. The Council decision to reintroduce fluoride in the drinking water system was made one month after a plebiscite in the 2021 Civic General Election found 62 per cent support for fluoridation amongst voters.

  • Ocean has presented a review of the science which I very much appreciate. If Ocean no longer conforms to your worldview that is not his problem. It seems to be a big problem for you though, to the point that you are impugning his reputation and even warning him of bad karma!? 😆

  • Tea….all tea? I doubt that all tea does, but I will look into it. You make a good point. Probably Louisa would stop drinking it.

  • I filter my water even if the water in my my city Lahti not bad. And I use toothpaste without fluoride, because I have heard it’s a brain toxic.

  • Great article. You didn’t address where the Fluoride, that they add to the water, is coming from. I live in Manchester MA. There was a picture, in our local newspaper, of the bag of fluoride added to our town water. The bag came from CHINA, and had the words POISON and a drawing of a SCULL and CROSSBONES on it. Why would we Ingest, on a daily basis, anything from China? Does anyone check on the ingredients in that bag such as the quality of the Fluoride and other added chemicals? There was a debate on Fluoride at a Town meeting where I addressed my concerns. I thought Fluoride did not pass the placenta barrier, which showed that it may be harmful to the baby and the body. I was proven wrong. I argued that adults may be getting too much fluoride, and must young people give their kids bottled water. The dentists won the day. Elaine Conway

  • Ocean, I love what you do most of the time. I am disappointed…flabbergasted…shocked…that you would take such a wishy washy, “trying to please everyone” and “refusing to challenge” approach to something so dangerous. It’s as if you are taking the stance of the controlled opposition.

    Besides fluoride being harmful to many areas of the body contributing to the slow death of the depopulation agenda; it’s main purpose for being put into dental regimens and the water supply was to dumb down the population, eliminate the ability to critically think, and to make it harder to connect with God through the calcification of our glands in the brain.

    And we absorb it through our skin as well.

    No one on earth needs an industrial chemical. There is no deficiency of an industrial chemical in our body.

    It has to do with personal choices of what we choose to put into our body, our personal hygiene, and our thoughts and feelings.

    We deal with the whole body. Our body is a complete system and no one part is separate from any other part, including our teeth. Blood and lymph flow through our entire body. Our teeth are a reflection of what is going on in our body.

    Ocean, you are a man who supports health. I do NOT understand why you would muddy the waters of truth by supporting the very powers and agencies, using their disinformation data, to confuse people who genuinely care about their health.

    These are the agencies behind most of what is wrong in our world and our health system. Why would you trust anyhing they would say? What makes this propaganda any different? Why would you think they are not using this information to forward their agenda of population control?

    You make it seem like it isn’t that big of a deal. It is! And you are supporting a money grabbing chemical industry to cheaply dispose of their waste by feeding it to us.

    If you are fearful to take a strong stand for Truth; and fearful or manipulated by the powers that be: It would be better for you to stay silent.

    You have a huge platform and a great reach and ability to influence many; and you make incredible karma by doing so with incorrect information. I hope you will do more thorough research in the future and not omit the facts that are deliberately being kept from public view.

    I was shocked by your article. People need absolute Truth to make informed choices. You are a great man. Strive to do better. I wish you the Greatest Victory in your quest to educate people about true health and diet. Take care. Be safe. Honor Truth and Life.

  • Ocean, I love what you do most of the time. I am disappointed…flabbergasted…shocked…that you would take such a wishy washy, “trying to please everyone” and “refusing to challenge” approach to something so dangerous. It’s as if you are taking the stance of the controlled opposition. Besides fluoride being harmful to many areas of the body contributing to the slow death of the depopulation agenda; it’s main purpose for being put into dental regimens and the water supply was to dumb down the population, eliminate the ability to critically think, and to make it harder to connect with God through the calcification of our glands in the brain. And we absorb it through our skin as well. No one on earth needs an industrial chemical. There is no deficiency of a chemical in our body. It has to do with personal choices of what we choose to put into our body, our personal hygiene, and our thoughts and feelings. We deal with the whole body. Our body is a complete system and no one part is separate from any other part, including our teeth. Blood and lymph flow through our entire body. Our teeth are a reflection of what is going on in our body. Ocean, you are a man who supports health. I do NOT understand why you would muddy the waters of truth by supporting the very powers and agencies, using their disinformation data, to confuse people who genuinely care about their health. These are the agencies behind most of what is wrong in our world and our health system. Why would you trust anyhing they would say? What makes this propaganda any different? Why would you think they are not using this information to forward their agenda of population control? You make it seem like it isn’t that big of a deal. It is! And you are supporting a money grabbing chemical industry to cheaply dispose of their waste by feeding it to us. If you are fearful to take a strong stand for Truth; and fearful or manipulated by the powers that be: It would be better for you to stay silent. You have a huge platform and a great reach and ability to influence many; and you make incredible karma by doing so with incorrect information. I hope you will do more thorough research in the future and not omit the facts that are deliberately being kept from public view. I was shocked by your article. You are a great man. Strive to do better. I wish you the Greatest Victory in your quest to educate people about true health. Take care.

  • Tea contains up to about 8ppm fluoride. I never heard of anyone giving up drinking tea because of the fluoride content.

  • After reading your report and some of these reviews i have to say i`m totally confused as to what is best.

  • I am more concerned with cognitive decline , in the older population, mouth hygiene cannot rely on one preventative, correct flossing , brushing , and rinsing the mouth after eating , acidic and sugary foods and drinks, is a huge preventative, also medicating the population without their consent is NOT ethical in my opinion.

  • Thank you I always enjoy your very good articles. Personally I do filter my own water not because of fluoride but also plastics.

  • I am surprised you did not mention toothpastes containing hydroxyapatite. 97% of tooth enamel is made up of hydroxyapatite and 70% of the dentin. It also makes up 60% of bones. It is a safe alternative to fluoride as long as it is not in nanoparticle form.

  • RE: “water filtration system… effective in removing fluoride; the best ones are reverse osmosis units and water softeners.”
    Question: Is distilled water (from previously fluoridated municipal water supplies) free of fluorine/fluoride?

  • I’m 77. I moved from an area with fluoridated water ten years ago. I had one cavity in about 15 years before we moved. In the last 10 years, I’ve had about six cavities filled, and I use toothpaste with fluoride and a fluoride rinse here. So, I’m dealing with expensive dental bills these days. I appreciate you presenting the science of both sides, and I wish our water were fluoridated.

  • Thank you for your balanced article on fluoride – and I agree that its presence in drinking water may cause systemic problems.

    I live in an area that does not fluoridate, but was curious to look at the claims of AquTru water purifier you are promoting. I was alarmed at the numbers that they say are provided through a partnership with the Environmental Working Group, based on data collected from over 48,000 municipal water supplies across the country.

    Well, either the data is grossly out-of-date for my zip code (95003) or they are making up false information to scare me, because my water district has met all the safe drinking water standards for 2024. I know that there are contaminants that may not be measured, but I am alarmed that the AquTru report said, for instance, that arsenic for my water supplier was 109 times the acceptable health guideline. When I check the online report posted by my local water district, the presence of arsenic is well below the 10 parts per billion (the EPA standard), and is only .5 parts per billion (ppb). How could AquTru’s numbers say my arsenic exposure is 109 times worse than acceptable, when in fact it is 20 times better than acceptable?

    Should I worry about the EPA standards? Well, the National Academy of Sciences estimates that the lifetime risk of developing bladder or lung cancer from arsenic in tap water (assuming 2 liters
    consumption per day) is greater than 3 in 1,000 for an arsenic level of 10 ppb. So my risk is 1/20th of 3 in 1,000…in other words very low.

    Of course there may be interactions with other chemicals present – I don’t deny that such synergy is possible. But should I buy a product that relies on false information? Maybe it can remove most contaminants to a lower level than my water department, but maybe it can’t.

    I really question the ethics of a company that provides wildly false reporting in its report for my zip code. I hope that Food Revolution Network will look into the numbers I found in “My Water Safety Report” provided by IsMyWaterSafe.com and amplified by AquTru’s inclusion of the report in their promotional material.

    Needless to say, I don’t trust anything that AquTru has to say if they are including such demonstrably false information that is designed to scare people into buying they product

  • Hi, I was surprised some time ago when I read that you thought fluoride was good when it was added to toothpaste. I have read that this fluoride is made from the byproducts of the nuclear industry and was toxic to humans. I have spent most of my life avoiding it in my toothpaste, etc. and I have beautiful fluoride free well water. You don’t mention in your article where this fluoride comes from and it’s effect on the whole body. I have heard that people who have fluoride naturally in their water system had great teeth but this natural fluoride is a very different substance than the laboratory chemical added to people’s water systems. Apparently it has been a great source of income for the nuclear industry selling fluoride to the water systems of countries of the world. Over the years I have read many articles on this issue and it has become an interest of mine.

  • How true are some of these statements, widely circulated online? Some do concur, albeit in a highly biased way, with what Ocean wrote here

    It was once industrial waste
    Banned in most of Europe
    After WWII, the aluminum industry had a problem –
    Toxic fluoride waste
    Disposal was expensive until someone had an idea –
    What is we ‘rebranded’ it as a dental treatment?
    Fluoride is sold to you as ‘essential for healthy teeth’
    But did you know it was originally a byproduct of aluminum manufacturing?
    And yes, it was used as rat poison in the early 20th century
    In 1945, Grand Rapids, Michigan became the first U.S. city to add fluoride to public drinking water. The public was told it would “prevent cavities”
    But many scientists warned of risks from the start.
    Fluoride is neurotoxic. A Harvard meta-analysis found that children in high – fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ.
    Other studies link it to – thyroid suppression, pineal gland calcification, and bone fragility.
    Europe didn’t fall for it.
    97% of Western Europe does not fluoridate water
    Countries like the Czech Republic, Finland, Poland, Germany, France, Belgium, and the Netherlands banned it partially. Why? They said it was unethical to medicate the population without consent.
    But in the U.S., the government pushed it hard. Dentists and doctors repeated the ‘safe and effective’ mantra.
    Skeptics were labeled ‘conspiracy theorists’. Sound familiar?
    Many European countries rejected water fluoridation decades ago; 98% of Western Europeans now drink non-fluoridated water

  • With very significant risks of skeletal fluorosis, ADHD, thyroid dysfunction, and most likely a host of other – NO WAY.

  • Fluoride is added to our water so I use a water filter and use toothpaste without fluoride.

  • I am a retired dental hygienist that has worked for 50 + years and I have seen the results of having the minimal amount added to our water supply in the earl 70’s in the Seattle WA area. There was a significant reduction in dental decay within a few years. I and the other dental hygienists and dentists ALL were witnesses to this. When fluoride is added to the water it is incorporated into the teeth as they form and the decay rate was dramatically reduced. Generations of Seattle’s residents have healthier mouths than 50-70 years ago. I strongly urge ALL cities and states in the US to keep fluoridation at the optimal level. It has been very beneficial.

  • My boys did a floride swish program in elementary school and at the time we were using tooth paste with floride. Both boys ended up needing dentures in their 20s. I blame the school for running a program that was not safe for children. We now use a counter top Reverse osmosis machine on our water as well as another water filter on our water spicket before it enters our rv. We no longer use any products that contain floride. But it is too late for my boys that have to wear dentures for the rest of their life. My daughter was older and didn’t do the swish program and she still has all her teeth at 48. Floride is bad and should not be forced on people in their water supply without their consent. Let those that want it use it topically.

  • Helen, have you had your well water tested? Groundwater can have all sorts of things leaching into it and not just locally, but from many miles distant. For example, if there’s a road anywhere near your well, it’s very probable that road runoff will add tyre breakdown products, motor oil, exhaust gas chemicals and whatever else gets accidentally spilled onto the road surface. Even without road runoff wild and domestic animal waste products will make their way into groundwater. And if there are farm animals grazing nearby their urine and faeces could easily contain any drugs or medication they’ve been dosed with. I wouldn’t be too complacent about the quality of your water without having it sampled and laboratory tested

  • The problem with tooth decay is not the lack of fluoride but the fact that the food industry is adding sugar to all processed foods. When one eats food that comes from the earth rather than a box, they have fewer chances to get cavities.

  • As a child lived in a no fluoride town, and again now living on farm, no fluoride – use two different types of toothpaste one with fluoride the other a herbal. So limit amount used. Have very strong, white adult and retained baby teeth. To be fair not much of a sweet drink or food eater.

  • Ocean, you should read “The Fluoride Deception”. Well written, documented and very informative.

  • Johnny, you omitted the aluminum industry, another toxic fluoride waste producer. Dentists charge $20.00-$50.00 for a 5 minute fluoride treatment with a materials cost of less than $1.00. Quite the incentive plan I’d say.

  • When I was little and growing up I had fluoride treatments at the dentist office, any lasting damage for me?

  • I am a Pediatrician. I see many children with extensive cavities.
    (even 1 is too many) Sadly, many parents do not brush their young children’s teeth even once a day. Older children/teens often do not brush either. Fluoridated water helps these children. It also helps the children who are brushing. The amount of fluoride in regulated water supplies is very small and is safe.

  • We have a reverse osmosis drinking water system and a water softener for many many years. Our two children were raised with this and had no cavities when they were children.

  • You didn’t mention much about health risks with fluoride in water. The risk of cancer diseases increases, especially for ostesarcoma in children (primarily boys). Recent research has also shown an increased risk of alzheimer and general cognitive decline in grown ups. It’s pure stupidity to put fluoride in the water. If people want fluoride for their teeth it should ONLY be used topically onto your teeth and not being swallowed down!

  • Hello,
    I grew up in Winnipeg,Manitoba, Canada from1940 to 1966. After that, we did not have fluoridated water.
    I am a 85year woman with no cavities.
    However, dental care with Dentist and home care has always included fluoride treatment and toothpaste.
    My molars have been replaced with crowns due to cracks in the teeth.
    Hmmm……
    I wonder if fluoride has cause the teeth to crack.
    I am very interested in fluoride causing AADHD???

    Please keep on your investigation of fluoride in drinking water.

    Lynne E Roseborough
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    Phone 604 943 6479

  • Fluoride can also damage your Pineal Gland, potentially leading to decreased melatonin production and sleep disturbances.

  • i am so disappointed that the food revolution often adopts a posture that looks like they do not want to “ruffle feathers” in order to not lose followers that have certain thoughts. The garbage in the water is HFSA from industry as you say and I saw with my own eyes lobby that travels around influencing municipalities to dump that garbage in the water that they would otherwise pay to dispose as toxic industrial waste!

  • Very good review of Fluoride – pros and cons. I am a dental professional. Definitely keep using dental products with Fluoride.

  • Thank you for the DETAILED comments/facts on both sides. I DO NOT use fluoridated products, and I have fluoride filters on all my water sources.

  • Years ago, I was told that the fluoride used in municipal water supplies was taken from industrial byproducts and therefore, not safe for human consumption. Is that accurate information?

  • Wow. Have to say this article has so much misinformation and just plain wrong info – hard to believe you put it online.

    Flouride not needed for dental health

    Fluoride added to water is a known toxin and byproduct of fertilizer and nuclear industries.

    Any potential use of a fluoride chemical is only topically applied to young kids teeth. Not drinking. In water supply

  • what makes you think that 1/1000 of a per cent difference in concentration actually makes any difference?

  • I went to a and e after doing flouride varnish on my teeth was given ivy fluids my level in blood was 1.4 now drinking mineral water from glass bottles to prevent further damage I thought I was going to die poison team said. had it been 5 in my blood woudlve died. now got the next time to have nac and glutathione supplements and calcium citrate magnesium citrate and potassium citrate supplemtent as flouride inhibits my absorption of these

  • Back in the year 2015, I deeply felt that people were getting too much fluoride in toothpaste alone, of 0.13% to 0.16% say. I’d try to find a toothpaste that was like: 0.12% to 0.125% fluoride in effect.

  • You should read “the Fluoride Deception” by Charles Bryson available – presumably – on Amazon. Interesting, well researched read and quite an eye opener. I consider myself lucky as a rural resident in the Scottish Highlands – no public water nearby so my own well can not be contaminated with very questionable chemicals.

  • >